Point by Point Responses to Reviewer Recommendations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Response to reviewers
We have revised the manuscript in its entirety, focusing on the aspects that differ from the existing literature, and in particular the nonlinear aspects of the problem. We have expanded the theoretical discussion in a number of places, including a comparison with the predictions of linear dispersive wave theory. The two sets of reviews have been divergent from the beginning, and we have endeav...
متن کاملFrom the Editors: Taking the Mystery out of Amj’s Reviewer Evaluation Form
One of the inspirations for this “From the Editors” column occurred at an Academy doctoral consortium a few years ago. A fourth-year Ph.D. student asked a common question: “How do I know what journals are looking for in my manuscripts?” Although a number of responses are possible, to be sure, the reply came, “Look at their reviewer evaluation form—that’s a good place to start.” It was clear fro...
متن کاملAuthor’s response to reviews Title: A comparison of multidisciplinary team residential rehabilitation with conventional outpatient care for the treatment of non-arthritic intra-articular hip pain in UK military personnel - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial Authors:
Title: A comparison of multidisciplinary team residential rehabilitation with conventional outpatient care for the treatment of non-arthritic intra-articular hip pain in UK military personnel a protocol for a randomised controlled trial Authors: Russell Coppack ([email protected]) James Bilzon ([email protected]) Andrew Wills ([email protected]) Ian McCurdie ([email protected]...
متن کاملAuthor's response to reviews Title: Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study Authors:
Author's response to reviews: see over 1 Dear Editor, Below, we present responses to comments raised by reviewers of our pending article titled: Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda-a cross-sectional study. We have presented a point by point response to each comment directly to the reviewer. All responses are presented in the order in which they are raised....
متن کاملAre reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
BACKGROUND BioMed Central (BMC) requires authors to suggest four reviewers when making a submission. Editors searching for reviewers use these suggestions as a source. The review process of the medical journals in the BMC series is open--authors and reviewers know each other's identity--although reviewers can make confidential comments to the editor. Reviews are published alongside accepted art...
متن کامل